https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52849
--- Comment #4 from Luis Bernardo <[email protected]> 2012-03-07 23:14:22 UTC --- I confess I did not put a lot of thought into that and instead used the same pattern that was already present in the that class in the notifyFontReplacement() method. But the remark is a good one. In a more general event framework the listener could even indicate at the time of registration of interest in a particular class of events whether to receive repeated events or just unique events. In the current event framework, yes, I think that letting the listener decide whether to notify or not the user makes sense. However, the problem I see is with the logging. If there is no listener the code falls back to log.warn() calls and I think we do not want repeated messages to clutter the logs. Maybe that is the reason it was done like this originally? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
