> > I wouldn’t bother. Lacking of a proper QA process, we don’t use the > ‘verified’ and ‘closed’ status and consider that a bug has been handled > once its status has been changed to ‘fixed’. > > Vincent >
Not sure I agree with you there Vincent. Giving a bug a "closed" status allows us to perform queries, as Glenn has, to see what patches are left outstanding and what needs to be applied. It also gives creates a necessary disparity between a [PATCH] which has "Resolved" and "Fixed" status, and when that patch has been applied. Also, we are always going to lack the "proper QA process" so I'm not sure that argument is valid. Mehdi
