On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:

> I also feel it is very important to continue using FOP documentation to
> create *some* output format. I am not prepared to give up our dog food,
> as that provides one more set of tests on FOP, that would otherwise be
> missing. Given the sparseness of FOP test coverage, the more content we
> formally run FOP on, the better.

s/FOP documentation/FOP processing/

Reply via email to