sounds reasonable, but I have a couple of questions on logistics: - the steps outlined at http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/dev/release.html don't really cover handling of a candidate release - what version # should be used, 1.09? 1.1rc1? - should this version # appear in the docs, code, or should 1.1 be used? - anything else?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Chris Bowditch <[email protected]>wrote: > On 30/05/2012 08:36, Glenn Adams wrote: > > Hi Glenn, > > > It would seem that to cut a FOP 1.1 release, we will need to do a >> simultaneous XGC dot release as well, since the former depends on >> unreleased changes in the latter. Is this correct? >> > > yes that is correct. FOP is highly dependent on XGC and there have been > many changes to both since FOP 1.0. We will need to release XGC 1.5 first > and then FOP 1.1. I propose that we first build Release Candidates for both > and then wait 2-3 weeks for feedback before releasing final versions of > both. > > Thanks, > > Chris >
