https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53820

--- Comment #2 from Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> FOP != DocBook; if you can express your enhancement request in terms of
> XSL-FO 1.1 [1] features or the future looking XSL-FO 2.0 requirements [2],
> then feel free to file a new enhancement bug
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20-req/

A little less abrupt answer would be preferable. User feedback is precious and
we wouldn't want to scare them off by responding bluntly.

Jan, please describe your issue on the fop-users mailing list:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/dev/index.html#mail-fop-dev (Bugzilla is used
to report identified bugs.)
Like Glenn send, your will have to provide us with an XSL-FO file (the result
of the transformation of your source DocBook file by the DocBook stylesheets),
as this is what we are working with. Ideally you would make it as small as
possible.

That said, you may want to try the docbook-apps mailing list first, as it might
just be a matter of customizing the DocBook stylesheets.
http://wiki.docbook.org/DocBookAppsMailingList

Thanks,
Vincent

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to