--- Comment #13 from Glenn Adams <> ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> As discussed, this commit has been reverted as the user can set the headless
> or any other JVM argument if they wish to do so. These arguments, however,
> should not be set by default.
> Glenn, should I set the status of this to invalid since it's not actually a
> bug? Or wontfix? Or should I just leave it be?

I would like to  have a better understanding if most usage of FOP requires
headed than headless. Since the FOP tests apparently work with headless mode, I
have to wonder if headless is the more typical usage.

A better fix would be to keep this original fix, and then change to headed if
AWT output is used if the user did not explicitly set headed or headless.

In other words, I think that switching to headed by default in order to fix AWT
usage is the wrong approach. I think we should use headless by default.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to