Hi Pascal,

I noticed the "Fix Version/s" Jira field and I was tempted to update it while 
resolving the issue. But the only version that applies is "trunk" which is a 
moving target...

I have not seen any guidelines related to Jira and FOP. If I miss something, 
please do tell me. I think, one should first decide the version number of the 
trunk (1.2 ? 2.0 ?) and add it to Jira. If an issue requires changes in code, 
then committers need to resolve it and update the "Fix" version. Finally, Jira 
creates "Release notes" based on this information and one should consider if 
and how this affects the usage of the status.xml

Alexis





On 14 Dec 2012, at 17:07, Pascal Sancho <psancho....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> before closing a bug, I think one should indicate what version its
> resolution does affect.
> 
> The goal is to easily manage changes pages in FOP website.
> 
> 2012/12/14 Alexis Giotis (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>:
>> 
>>     [ 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>>  ]
>> 
>> Alexis Giotis closed FOP-1840.
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>>> [PATCH] Region-Body Column balancing incorrect if content is table with 
>>> header
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>>                Key: FOP-1840
>>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1840
>>>            Project: Fop
>>>         Issue Type: Improvement
>>>         Components: page-master/layout
>>>   Affects Versions: 1.0
>>>        Environment: Operating System: All
>>> Platform: PC
>>>           Reporter: a.kovacs
>>>           Assignee: fop-dev
>>>        Attachments: b49801_dirty_hack.patch, b49801.fo, 
>>> balance-2-expected.pdf, balance-2.fo, balance-2.pdf, balance-3.fo.xml, 
>>> balance-4-edited.fo.xml, balance-4.fo.xml, balance-4-none.fo.xml, 
>>> balance-4.pdf, balance-5.fo, balancing-fos.zip, fix.diff, fo.xml, 
>>> output-balance5.pdf, patch.diff, test-after.pdf, test-before.pdf
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To reproduce bug please do the following:
>>> Use:
>>> <fo:region-body region-name="PageBody" column-count="2" />
>>> Fill the region-body with content like :
>>> <fo:block span="none" > ...(content is table with header) ..
>>> <fo:block span="all"> ... (one line (summary)) ..
>>> If the content is made of normal blocks the columns are balanced before the 
>>> span="all" summary line.
>>> like:
>>> 123456    456789
>>> 234567    567890
>>> 345678    678901
>>> Summary: 1234567890
>>> If the content is a table without headers the columns are balanced correct.
>>> like:
>>> 123456    456789
>>> 234567    567890
>>> 345678    678901
>>> Summary: 1234567890
>>> If the content is a table with header the columns are not balanced correct. 
>>> (the right one is shorter.)
>>> Header    Header
>>> 123456    567890
>>> 234567    678901
>>> 345678
>>> 456789
>>> Summary: 1234567890
>>> The "computeDemerits()" algorithm is wrong in class 
>>> "BalancingColumnBreakingAlgorithm".
>>> The "fullLen" value is to short. Exactly the replicated header width is 
>>> missing. In the "par" list the header is contained only once although the 
>>> header is displayed in every column. (in the example twice)
>>> Solution could be to place the header as many times in the "par" list as 
>>> many columns exist, or to count the existing one header as many times as 
>>> needed.
>> 
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> pascal

Reply via email to