[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14584511#comment-14584511
 ] 

Andreas L. Delmelle commented on FOP-2469:
------------------------------------------

Hi Gregor

As to the latter remark, just to be clear: 
I am using the exact same FO file that is attached to this issue. 
I am quite certain the error is triggered due to changes in my local sandbox, 
either as a result of other changes conflicting with yours or the result of 
errors in resolving some merge conflicts...
It all works A-OK on my end if I remove the innermost table.

I was just wondering if it pointed to a case that was overlooked, since the 
attached test _is_ rather minimal[*], and strictly speaking, from looking only 
at the code, there does not seem to be a _guarantee_ that it will never happen, 
i.e. that TableCellLM.getRefIPD() will _always_ be greater than or equal to 
TableCellLM.getMinimumIPD() ( ? )

In addition, I was also hoping that you could offer insights as to why that 
_should not_ be happening, so I would get a clue on where to start looking 
first... ;)

[*] BTW - Can you provide some more FO examples testing other scenarios, that 
we can convert to layout engine test cases and make part of the patch? That 
would definitely be a valuable addition, too.

> [PATCH] auto table layout
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOP-2469
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2469
>             Project: FOP
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: layout/unqualified
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>         Environment: Windows 7, JDK 7
>            Reporter: Gregor Berg
>            Assignee: Andreas L. Delmelle
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: 2015-05-13-auto-table-layout.patch, 
> 2015-05-27-LM-to-LC-refactoring.patch, 
> 2015-06-09-LM-to-LC-refactoring-update.patch, FOP2469-auto-table-layout.xml, 
> LayoutContext_Tweak.diff
>
>
> Hi,
> this is a patch which enables table-layout=auto. It is quite robust, it can 
> not only handle linebreaks and pagebreaks, but it also copes with auto tables 
> in fixed tables in auto tables.
> Essentially, it is the patch of issue FOP-2450 adapted to the trunk version 
> of FOP.
> Best regards,
> Gregor



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to