[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16776412#comment-16776412
 ] 

Jan Tošovský commented on FOP-2846:
-----------------------------------

Looking into FOP/Batik code I found transparency is supported for both stroke 
and fills, but only if specified by fill-opacity/stroke-opacity properties. If 
general opacity is used, the graphics is considered as too complex for 
rendering using primitive methods, so it is rasterized.

Parsing fill-opacity is done in batik-bridge class 
PaintServer.convertFillPaint()

Parsing opacity is done in batik-bridge classes 
AbstractGraphicsNodeBridge.buildGraphicsNode() -> CSSUtilities.convertOpacity()

Deciding if element is rasterized is done in batik-gvt class 
AbstractGraphicsNode.isOffscreenBufferNeeded()

I suppose in case of SVG path elements (+ other shapes) the general opacity 
could be treated in same way as fill-opacity and stroke-opacity and excluded 
from cases triggering the rasterization.

 

> SVG not handled / rendered / embedded properly
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOP-2846
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2846
>             Project: FOP
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.3
>            Reporter: Björn Kautler
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2019-02-21-12-15-39-802.png, 
> image-2019-02-21-12-17-26-206.png, image-2019-02-21-13-35-21-628.png, 
> image-2019-02-21-14-41-29-088.png, image-2019-02-21-14-42-11-550.png, 
> med-folder-journal.svg, roadsign-attention.svg, svg-test.fo, svg-test.pdf
>
>
> It seems FOP does not handle all SVGs properly.
> The attached [^svg-test.fo] which displays the attached files 
> [^roadsign-attention.svg] and [^med-folder-journal.svg] demonstrate the 
> problem.
> The result of {{fop-2.3/fop/fop svg-test.fo svg-test.pdf}} can be seen in 
> [^svg-test.pdf], especially if you zoom in.
> The {{med-folder-journal.svg}} is properly displayed and scaled, the 
> {{roadsign-attention.svg}} looks like the triangle is rendered to pixels that 
> scale up, but the exclamation mark properly scales.
> Here the PDF content as screenshot on 1200%:
> !image-2019-02-21-12-15-39-802.png!
> Using the code at [https://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/using/swing.html] 
> shows that Batik 1.10 can perfectly fine scale up the SVG:
> !image-2019-02-21-12-17-26-206.png!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to