[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17142377#comment-17142377
 ] 

Eugene Markovskyi commented on FOP-2540:
----------------------------------------

[~adelmelle] thank you for the research and proposal. It is a pity that the 
changes are still not merged. I am trying to patch the current FOP version to 
support fonts with Platform ID = 0 Unicode encoding. I added a small change - 
it is just reading Platform ID = 0 encoding if others (Platform ID = 3) are not 
provided. Tests show that FOP uses such encoding correctly. As I see your patch 
contains much more changes.  I tend to think that I was too optimistic when I 
was applying such simple patch. But I assume your patch implemented supporting 
of non unicode encodings also. Could you please give me a hint what changes 
from your patch should be applied to support only Unicode(Platform ID = 0) 
encoding? Thanks in advance.

> [PATCH] Enhance TTF/OTF support beyond Windows
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOP-2540
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2540
>             Project: FOP
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: font/opentype
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>         Environment: OS X
>            Reporter: Andreas L. Delmelle
>            Assignee: Andreas L. Delmelle
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: FOP-2540.patch, test_osx_fonts_after_1.log, 
> test_osx_fonts_before.log
>
>
> Currently, cmap tables in TTF/OTF are only supported for Platform ID = 3, 
> i.e. MS Windows. There is no support for Platform ID = 0, i.e. basic Unicode, 
> or 1, i.e. Macintosh.
> This makes quite some system fonts bundled with OS X supposedly unusable. The 
> solution is fairly trivial (patch proposal will be attached shortly), 
> provided the cmap table format in the font is already supported. FOP 
> currently only has support for cmap format 4 (segment to delta mapping), but 
> this seems to suffice for most of the Unicode cmaps as well.
> See also FOP-2539, which triggered me to investigate this closer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to