I believe that since this is a breaking change between PDFBox 2 to PDFBox 3, a 
major version increment for xmlgraphics should be considered.
This would be a good time to consider moving  xmlgraphics versioning pattern 
from the legacy major.minor to major.minor.patch.

-Josh

From: Chris Bowditch <bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 6:58 AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: PDFBox 3


  ⚠ EXTERNAL MESSAGE – Think Before You Click

Hi Simon, +1 from me Thanks, Chris On 09/10/2024 15: 05, Simon Steiner wrote: > 
Hi, > > I have created branches on FOP-3203 to move to PDFBox 3, more testing 
would > be needed to finish the work before merging. > Some customers
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an Unknown or New Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Senders are verified 
following multiple days of correspondence.
This Fiserv Warning Tag will automatically be removed when responding to 
external parties.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Simon,



+1 from me



Thanks,



Chris



On 09/10/2024 15:05, Simon Steiner wrote:

> Hi,

>

> I have created branches on FOP-3203 to move to PDFBox 3, more testing would

> be needed to finish the work before merging.

> Some customers will be using an environment where this version is required.

> I think we should move fop to this, I request your feedback, if this idea

> would cause any problems, as client code would need to change to use PDFBox

> 3 API.

>

> Thanks

>


  • PDFBox 3 Simon Steiner
    • Re: PDFBox 3 Chris Bowditch
      • RE: PDFBox 3 Marquart, Joshua (Coral Springs) via fop-dev

Reply via email to