Alex McLintock wrote:

Isn't this the virtue of XSLT rather than XSL FO ?



XSL:FO *is* XSLT !

One is part of the other and not totally separate!

Alex


Hello,

Although I am not a guru of XSL*, I would dare to argue with that. In fact, XSL consists of three technologies - XSLT, XPath and XSL:FO. You can simply use XSLT with XPath and do not worry about XSL:FO at all - IMHO, this is the most popular scenario of XSL usage. Or you can just write straight XSL:FO documents and don't use XSLT.


Andrius




Reply via email to