Jon Steeves wrote:
Why is fo:wrapper more desirable?
If you want only set properties for text, you don't need
all the area stuff fo:inline generates. The fo:wrapper
doesn't create an area and should require less load for
the formatting engine.
Well, in FOP fo:inline and fo:wrapper are basically
synonyms, because the area generation part of fo:inline
isn't implemented.
J.Pietschmann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
