Clay Leeds wrote:
IIRC, <fo:block/> is ignored by FOP (or rather the XSL-FO spec indicates
it should be ignored).

I don't think so. There are ambiguities in the spec regarding <fo:block/>, but it is certainly not to be ignored, and FOP 0.20.5rc1 and CVS handles it probably correctly.

J.Pietschmann


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to