Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think there's a patch around for that. If you think making AWT > optional is important please file a "request for enhancement" in > BugZilla for future reference so we can respect that in the redesign.
Half a year (minus some hours) ago, I filed bug #14679 :-). > I think it should be relatively simple to make AWT optional. Basically > two steps are necessary: > - Modify build.xml so only the AWT-dependant classes can be compiled > conditionally. > - Modify the classes that have AWT-dependant stuff in them so they run > without AWT (see Jimi, JAI and JCE support as an example). > There are special AWT-backends out there for headless servers. Maybe > there's also a dummy AWT package somewhere. Just a thought. I will look into this. Thanks! Tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
