Hello Ryan, you're writing about a stylesheet-cache. How did you implement it? Do you use XSLTC or do you reuse the InputHandler object (according to the documentation, it can be reused).
Markus $> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- $> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Mai 2003 14:16 $> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $> Betreff: Re: Performance Question $> $> $> $> $> Sorry, I should have included these details also: $> $> Our PDFs are produced during a batch process, meaning the $> JVM is started $> once and all PDFs are then created. This, of course, means $> the JVM stays $> "warm" and we can take full advantage of HotSpot compilation. $> $> We also have implemented a style sheet cache, so once the $> style sheet has $> been used once the compiled version is reused over and over, which $> definitely helps performance. $> $> All of our XML/XSLT interfaces use JAXP, meaning we can plug $> in different $> XML/XSLT processors. We currently use Saxon 6.5.2 because it's the $> fastest, but it appears the recently-released Xalan 2.5 has $> closed the gap $> considerably. $> $> Even though the computer has 1 GB RAM available, we only $> allocate a max $> heap size of 512 MB. $> $> $> $> $> $> $> [EMAIL PROTECTED] $> $> ul.com To: $> [EMAIL PROTECTED] $> cc: $> $> 05/02/2003 06:58 Subject: Re: $> Performance Question $> AM $> $> Please respond to $> $> fop-user $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> I have FOP running on a Pentium 4 2.54 GHz computer with 1 $> GB memory and $> Win2000. I use Saxon 6.5.2 as the XML parser and XSLT $> engine. It also $> uses custom XMLReaders to produce SAX events which are $> processed by FOP. $> $> We usually see a PDF production rate of 8-9 pages per second, and we $> sometimes produce PDFs that are 1500+ pages. The only real $> problem with $> FOP is some of the XSL style sheet tricks necessary to $> insert intermittent $> page-sequences so FOP doesn't run out of memory. $> $> Hope this helps. $> $> $> $> $> "Christian $> $> Neuroth" To: $> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: $> $> Subject: Performance $> Question $> 04/30/2003 03:30 $> $> AM $> $> Please respond to $> $> fop-user $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> In my company, we are currently using StreamServe to produce $> documents $> (basically invoices). $> 50.000 docs/day, 3.000 prints, 47.000 pdf. $> The final document averages 3 pages (there are some $> exceptions with up to $> 1000 pages - very rare, however), a document containing only $> one graphic $> (logo). $> $> I am puzzling whether I can shift from StreamServer to FOP. $> Are there any $> people out there who apply FOP to achieve a similar volume? Is the $> performance ok? $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> --------------------------------------------------------------------- $> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $> $> $> $> $> $> $> $> --------------------------------------------------------------------- $> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
