From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<snip/>
I can't absolutely position the image (as I've done previously) because I don't know the amount of data in the table. I could (possibly?) create a table...
--------------------- | | A | B | C | | Image | x | x | x | | | x | x | x | |-------| x | x | x | | | x | x | x | | | x | x | x | | | x | x | x | | | x | x | x | ---------------------
I recommend creating a parent table with two columns and nesting the inner table in the second column.
(assuming that images can be nested inside a table), but the column-width for the image would be in mm and the other columns are "proportional-column-width". I don't know if this is a problem.
As long as you define the width of both columns in the parent table, and specify the width of the second column as the width of the inner table, I think it should work.
I was also hoping I wouldn't need to do a rowspan.
I dont think you will need to.
<snip/>
Chris
_________________________________________________________________
Find a cheaper internet access deal - choose one to suit you. http://www.msn.co.uk/internetaccess
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]