> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert P. J. Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> >
> > I can't confirm it, but surely there is *no* fix.
>
> i'm not sure what you mean by "surely".  recall that this is the
> same problem i mentioned a while back -- in a variable list, i asked
<snip/>
>
> when we had this earlier discussion, i verified that the FO file
> did not contain anything that would suggest this kind of break,
> so it was pretty clearly FOP that was doing something weird.
>

if i'm not mistaken, the reply was <q> according to the code, this shouldn't
happen </q>
and that the stated problem would be looked at in more detail, if there was
the time for it...

> so what do you mean by saying that there is surely no fix?
>

i guess this means that this is not the case. perhaps it got a bit out of
focus because no one bothered to enter a bug for it?

Greetz,

Andreas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to