--- Mike Trotman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't find any mentions of this (but may have > missed them) so my > current impression is that this is undefined / > implementation dependent. >
I believe you're correct on this--the spec is vague on this point, so you should take this issue as implementation-dependent. Currently, the fo:region-body has coded precedence in 1.0 I believe. Glen __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]