--- Mike Trotman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I can't find any mentions of this (but may have
> missed them) so my 
> current impression is that this is undefined /
> implementation dependent.
> 

I believe you're correct on this--the spec is vague on
this point, so you should take this issue as
implementation-dependent.  Currently, the
fo:region-body has coded precedence in 1.0 I believe.

Glen



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to