Chris Bowditch wrote: > J.Pietschmann wrote: > > I love it when you rattle a list off like this. I really ought to > capture this and put it on the website somewhere, along with a priority.
Yes please :-). One problem at the moment is that the website (which is excellent, on the whole) has no reference to a development timeline, and a new user will notice that the last release was 9 months ago, and wonders what's happening. Admittedly, a bit of additional searching will take them to the mailing list archives, but one has to do a lot of reading to build up a picture of the current state of play. > Of course, priorities are just my opinion, but I think we need to do all > the highs in order to do an initial release, 0.5.0? Speaking only for myself here, but I'd be *very* happy to see a release with all the high stuff implemented. I think that it would basically fix all my current problems with FOP, and would probably satisfy 90%+ of users. Frankly, FOP 0.20.5 is pretty good, and if I could have the feature set that it offers with keeps, that would solve most of my problems. My 2p worth, Mike. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
