> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Is that a FOP problem or do I have an error in my FO (see attachment). > > Can't say for sure. Anyone to comment in on this? >
Did further research, and the construct you use does leave quite a lot of (maybe too much) room for interpretation... >From the XSL-FO Rec: <quote> 6.4.11 fo:conditional-page-master-reference ... There are three traits, page-position, odd-or-even and blank-or-not-blank that specify the sub-conditions on the use of the referenced page-master. All three sub-conditions must be true for the condition on the fo:conditional-page-master-reference to be true. ... The sub-condition corresponding to the page-position trait is true if the page generated using the fo:conditional-page-master-reference has the specified position in the sequence of pages generated by the referencing page-sequence; namely, "first", "last", "rest" (not first nor last) or "any" (all of the previous). </quote> So, if you define two c-p-m-r's, one with page-position="rest" the other with none specified, you are making certain that one way or the other, in an N-paged page-sequence there will always be the distinction: (page 1/page N --page-position="any") vs. (pages 2 to N-1 --page-position="rest"). First question that arises: do you really need to do this? Still not sure whether it would be an error in FOP to assign the static-content only to the pages in the second c-p-r-m, but I haven't yet found any evidence for that. Hope this helps! Cheers, Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
