> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Hi, > sorry if i'm sending you this mail directly to you, instead of to the list > Well, that's no particular problem to me, but I'm cc-ing fop-user anyway, so this info gets to reach all users. You never know if someone else also finds use for it. For now, one thing I can add is that the current development version (FOP 1.0) does even worse than 0.20.5 with your source FO, as it ends in an OutOfMemoryException :( > i have a 27 KB xsl file and 342 KB xml file, > after i ran the xalan, i got a huge 4 MB fo file., is this kind > of normal ? Can be considered normal, if you take into account that your file contains 18026 fo:table-cells, so that would already be at least 18026 * (15 + 16) bytes (+500 KB for the cells' markup alone... 15 for <fo:table-cell>, 16 for </fo:table-cell>) Also, quite a few tables seem to be nested. I think it would help a great deal if you can come up with a layout avoiding these as much as possible (--and if this is impossible, then it would certainly be advisable to check whether you can change the layout to distribute the content over multiple page-sequences. See if there are criteria along which you can logically divide the data into chunks of a few pages.) > as a attachment, i send you my fo file,...not the big one.. > i erased all the cell-formating and the graphics, > and still it is 2 MB big > Not posting this one to fop-user. Any interested parties, please contact Sandy or myself to obtain a copy. > when i run the fop processor under the dos console, i got always > warning/error message, > saying error of PID, or something like that,..you have any idea ? > The error is about IPD, which stands for Inline Progression Dimension, which is more or less the same as width (not exactly: only in languages with Left-to-Right-Top-to-Bottom script, like most Western languages; in that context, I[nline]PD is left-to-right, and B[lock]PD is top-to-bottom. IPD and BPD are actually more abstract) Anyway, it's caused by two tables that have no width property (line 85 and line 129). If you add width="100%" to these two, the errors go away. The warnings remain however... Can't say for sure what's causing these, though. I tried modifying a few things, but no results. In case you're wondering: the units of measurement shown are millipoints (=1/72 inch or roughly 0.35mm) > this table came from 12 rows and about 1000 columns... > > can you give me any tricks,how can I increase the performance... > for this table, it took ca. 28000 ms to complete all the process > See the hints supplied above: change the layout to use less tables, or if that is impossible, try chopping it up into multiple page-sequences. This will at least keep the memory requirement manageable. Greetz, Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
