I was using Acrobat Standard Edition 6.0.1. I also tried it on Acrobat Reader v5.0.5 on another machine. Same results for me, bleeding still occurs.
Were you zooming all the way in on the edge of the cell? Although it is not bad in this example file, with a table border turned on, the problem looks much worse. The blue background overwrites the outside table border. -----Original Message----- From: John Burgess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 5:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Border issue Matthew Either I'm being even more stupid than usual or there's a problem with your acrobat reader. In the pdf you attached on my machine (NT4 (SP4) and Acrobat 5.0.0 the blue colour is perfectly contained in the cell. I think the Standard Error text seems a little high in the cell below but since you're not complaining about that... Have you tried it on another machine? John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:19 PM Subject: FW: Border issue /bump -----Original Message----- From: Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.) Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Border issue Ok, I've stripped my example down even further. I've eliminated all "padding" attributes. I have background-color enabled on a single cell. I also am now using borders only on table-cell elements. I turned off the outside border on the table in case it was a problem. In the new example attached here, the background color is clearly bleeding all over the place (especially since I set it only for a single cell). I can see no attributes left in my XSL-FO to explain it. If I move background-color to the fo:block, the pattern is the same. My understanding of the XSL-FO spec was that padding pushed out beyond the borders and that was why you suggested eliminating padding. Is there any hope of using background color (or a workaround that achieves the same effect) in 0.20.5? Your response seems to indicate that I should not be seeing this behavior. -----Original Message----- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Border issue Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.) wrote: > Thanks for the answer. What is the proper workaround for not using > padding? I need to keep space between my blocks and the borders of > the cells. Some of the cells have single blocks, some have multiple > blocks (like the header row). Enclose the content in yet another block, and try to use space-before/space-start/whatever on this block. Padding might work in this case. J.Pietschmann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ---- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
