Write a test case, and you'll know. And don't forget to check it in. :-) Seriously, I'd appreciate if you did that because I don't understand what you mean.
On 15.02.2005 21:02:14 J.Pietschmann wrote: > Chris Bowditch wrote: > > minor correction: table footers have been implemented thanks to Jeremias. > > If a table footer happens to overflow the page in the first > unbreakable area, i.e. no visible content from the footer on > that page, the layout of a few rows has to be undone in order > to put the footer in the page. I don't think this is implemented > in HEAD, the maintenance code gets this almost right. That's > what I meant with "not yet *properly* implemented" Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
