BATTLEGROUND AMERICA
By
Eric S. Margolis   5 November 2000

A lot of American voters are clearly perplexed or dismayed by having to
choose between a: Al Gore, an unlikable, big-government Washington
politician with all the warmth of a scowling cigar store Indian, and b:
amiable but shallow George W Bush, who often sounds like he should be
running for the Texas school system rather than president of the world's
most powerful nation.

Voters are uncomfortable with these political test tube babies, who were
both bred and reared to dynastic politics.  The two fringe  candidates in
the unthrilling 2000 election, leftist Ralph Nader and rightist  Pat
Buchanan, are at least self-made politicians and real people who say
refreshingly heretical things.

Ten percent of voters remain undecided; their last-minute mood swing  may
determine the election.

In this female-oriented campaign, voters must struggle through the
candidate's boring proposals on education, daycare, female health, drug
plans, taxes, and pensions, all as easily comprehensible as the
instructions to your VCR.   `Male' issues, like foreign policy, defense,
and crime,  have been largely ignored.

The media nervously trumpets the race is neck-a-neck, with Gore holding a
slight edge in many big states.  One must be wary of America's  print and
electronic media, which is predominantly controlled by liberal Democrats.
 Surveys show 70-80% of all journalists are registered Democrats.
 Hollywood, the mouthpiece of America's liberal left and far-left,
reinforces the pro-Democratic message through TV sitcoms like `The West
Wing' and romantic chick flics about thinly disguised Clinton act-alikes.

Bush still holds a narrow lead in the popular vote.  But he must overcome
the daunting arithmetic of the all-important electoral college which elects
the president(voters do not):  whoever wins a simple majority gets all the
electoral votes of 48 out of 50 states.  This curious system was designed
by the Founding Fathers as a safeguard against a demagogue buying mob votes
by offering, say, free land or free whiskey.

Ironically, in modern America, the electoral college gives an unfair
advantage to big population states like California, New York, Illinois and
Florida,  whose large, urban minorities are routinely bought by promises of
welfare handouts, government jobs and other freebies.

Step back from the melee of US politics and often blurred differences
 between Republicans and Democrats, and you see two main camps:  a party of
government, and a party of taxpayers.

The Democrats are the party of government.  They generally believe big
government should perform active social engineering through regulation and
income redistribution between social groups.  Dems favor high  taxes,
centralized control from Washington, socialized medicine,  abortion and gun
control, oppose state's rights, and hate smokers.

Democrats range from moderates and conservatives, who are indistinguishable
from Republicans, all the way over to the business-hating Sierra Club,
Hollywood's movie marxists, the leftish chic Jane Fonda-Hillary Clinton
crowd, and the male-hating Lesbian  Left.

People who live off the public purse - teachers, government workers and
bureaucrats, welfare recipients, the culture crowd,  single mothers - are
strongly Democratic. Blacks vote 98% Democratic. So, too, immigrants  -
exhibit A being California, where the non-white population has grown to 51%
and Democrats now outnumber once dominant Republicans thanks to a flood of
Mexican and Asian immigrants that caused a white exodus to the mountain
states.

Lawyers, America's most hated group after child molesters, are the biggest
cash donor to the Democrats:  in this race a whopping US $73 million. Next
comes Hollywood, with $25 million, big public sector unions, $12.6 million,
and teachers unions.  Jews, though only 2% of the population, provide
almost half the Democratic Party's funding, and are its most influential
single group.  Italians and Irish, once Democratic stalwarts, long ago
decamped to the Republicans. Blacks and union members provide the party's
foot soldiers.  Gays, and young women who are  deeply influenced by
Hollywood TV sitcoms and talk shows,  vote strongly Democratic.

Republicans  are the party of taxpayers and investors.  White men and a
majority of married women vote Republican.  Republicans favor less and
smaller government, political decentralization to local levels, lower
taxes, less regulations, the free market, and decisions made by citizens
rather than bureaucrats.

But Republicans are also split into two camps:  the larger, moderates and
libertarians,  who believe in political, economic, and social
laissez-faire; and the small but vocal Christian hard right, which seeks to
impose its social beliefs about abortion, drink, censorship, and sex on
everyone. Also strongly Republican: America's military men and women, gun
owners, small town dwellers, and big businesses like oil and gas,
pharmaceuticals, defense,  and demon tobacco.  In all, Republicans have
raised $187 million to the Democrat's $133 million - just for the
presidential race. An equal amount will be spent on the Senate and House
races.  TV stations are growing rich on political advertising.

Hispanics, America's fastest growing ethnic group, have voted Democratic in
the past. However, Republicans, led by the Spanish-speaking Bush, are
making important inroads among Hispanics, who tend, like many Republicans,
 to be socially conservative and family-oriented.   The Hispanic vote could
very likely determine the 2000 election.

America's forgotten minority of  8 million Muslims, about 4% of voters, has
suddenly become an important factor  in this every- vote-counts race.
 Gore's decades-long financial support by the Israel lobby,  his ardently
pro-Israeli stance, and current bloodshed in Palestine, are driving Muslim
voters to the Republicans, and could tip the balance in Michigan, Illinois,
and even California.

How much effect Bill Clinton, the Banquo's ghost of this election, will
have is uncertain. Gore ignored his tarnished mentor until
he became desperate for Clinton's campaign magic.  Sexy Bill  may help the
stolid Gore with female voters, but his legacy of impeachment and endless
fund-raising scandals might drive many undecided voters to the less
tarnished Republicans.


The race for Congress is even more important, though less colorful  than
the presidential contest. Congress controls  the nation's spending and
lawmaking.  Americans often like to split their votes, giving one party
control of Congress and the other the White House.  During the past eight
years,  the Republican-run Congress kept a lid of spending, brought down
the debt, and nurtured prosperity.  Clinton's most important contribution
was to do very little. He was, however, brilliant  acting as a super MC for
the country and gushing emotion on TV. But Clinton took and was given
credit for the historic economic boom fathered by President Ronald Reagan.
  Gore might end up as president and the tight-wad Republicans ruling the
Hill - or visa versa.

But if the Democrats accomplish their cherished goal of retaking Congress,
some of their most liberal members will become powerful committee chairmen,
assuring higher government spending and higher taxes, both of which will
hurt the still robust economy.  Americans tend to be wary of trusting
free-spending Democrats with their money.

Tuesday's race will very likely be decided in California, Florida,
Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Missouri.  If Ralph Nader's
Green Party  siphons off too many leftwing votes, Gore could lose.
 Buchanan is off the radar scope.

Bush might carry 30 states yet still lose the election.  If Bush loses
California, which is likely, he must win all the big Midwest states and
Florida. The presidential victor will carry many Congressional candidates
on his coattails. In New York, the hated/adored Hillary Clinton seems
likely to win her senate race, a prelude to her presidential ambitions in
2004 or 2008.

Election watchers should be prepared for a very late night Tuesday.  This
 column's usually reliable crystal ball has gone cloudy.  The race is too
tight to call, the closest in 40 years. Weather could play a decisive
influence, with rain or snow favoring the Republicans.  Our best indicator
may be the Tuesday stock market close:  up, a Bush win; down, a Gore win.

Copyright: Eric S. Margolis, November 2000




To send *personal mail* to Eric Margolis, please do not click reply, but use this link:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**************
To UNSUBSCRIBE to this list click the following link and enter the words UNSUBSCRIBE 
FOREIGNC in the body of the email.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Reply via email to