Hello, I have updated the RFC [1] with the leading option that emerged out of the discussions so far - using NPM + Webpack to handle our assets. Please make any comments you may still have on the RFC. If no significant issues are raised with this choice over the next week or so, this RFC will be considered accepted and I will start implementing the solution based on my POC[2].
[1] https://github.com/theforeman/rfcs/pull/3 [2] https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/3433 On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Tomer Brisker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > TL;DR: Options to mange asset dependencies are under discussion at [1] > > Several of the core Foreman and Katello developers (Ohad, Walden, Daniel, > Tomas, Eric and I) have been talking about the possibility of changing the > way we handle our asset packages (js/css/etc). > We would like to open up the discussion to the community so we can get > more input and reach a decision, so I have created an RFC [1] based on our > discussions and experimentations. > The current way is with a mix of gems handled by bundler and some code > manually added under the vendor/ directory. This has some downsides which > are explained in the RFC. > Looking forward we have several options we could choose from, which are > all listed with their respective pros and cons in the RFC. > Please add your comments on the pull request and I will attempt to > incorporate everything until an agreed decision is made. > > [1] https://github.com/theforeman/rfcs/pull/3 > > -- > Have a nice day, > Tomer Brisker > Red Hat Engineering > -- Have a nice day, Tomer Brisker Red Hat Engineering -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
