On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 14:08 +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > Ohad mentioned this on our coffee meeting, but why we insist on > OpenShift? It's just a regular Rails app, we could easily drop it to > one of our web hosts and maybe the performance will be even better > than it was. > > In other words, no OpenShift V3, our infra for now and forever. Not > sure how much work is to puppetize this, but this could be, I know > someone will eat me for these words, simply a pet server with no > automatization. > > /me runs away! :-)
Our infra is already overloaded (see other mials on this list), so something else would have to give way for it. Openshift is free and a good fit for anything "simple" and self-contained, which is why Redmine, PrProcessor, and the Etherpad run on it. If we cannot get this resolved, or if the extra v3 resources aren't granted, then we'll have to do exactly that, but I'll take what free handouts we can get :) Current update BTW, the load is dropping (now sitting around 7) and I've opened a support ticket. Preliminary feedback is that is likely due to a large number of people upgrading their v2 accounts to Silver to avoid the sunset, leading to increased load on the cluster. Hopefully it'll settle down soon. Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
