Thanks for the screenshots! 

I like that the information is grouped together. I think that this could 
easily be integrated into the host designs that were done.


On Sunday, November 12, 2017 at 1:36:08 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
> OK, I have managed to create some screenshots of the before and after 
> state. Please don't judge the styling - it's more about the technical 
> abilities than the styling.
>
> I will take Puppet as an example. Let's say we have puppet facet that has 
> the following data: puppet environment, puppet proxy and puppet ca proxy 
> fields plus a list of puppet classes assigned to the host.
>
> Before: 
> The information is spread on multiple screens:
> Take a look at this screenshot: https://ibb.co/bsXT8G it shows where this 
> information is currently located on the main tab.
> This screenshot: https://ibb.co/ksuaoG shows the detailed puppet classes 
> view.
>
> After:
> Everything related to puppet is presented on a single tab. This tab can be 
> enabled and disabled based on user's preference - the user can decide to 
> turn puppet management on or off for this host.
> https://ibb.co/bNnd8G shows the tab when the fields are enabled, and 
> https://ibb.co/eCJ72b shows all the fields disabled.
>
> I hope it helps to visualize both options.
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 12:08:06 AM UTC+2, Walden Raines wrote:
>>
>> Hey Shim,
>>
>> Can you please include screenshots (or, even better, a quick video or 
>> gif) of the new UI to make it easier for people to visualize who don't have 
>> the code checked out?
>>
>> Assuming I'm understanding your description of the two options, I would 
>> also vote for option #2 as option #1 sounds like it would be very difficult 
>> to ensure a good UI since some other plugin could just put whatever they 
>> want wherever in the UI.  
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Walden
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Timo Goebel <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have been playing with Facets the last few weeks and must say, that 
>>> they are really great. It's pretty easy to add dedicated functionality to 
>>> the host model and I want to use that for some of my plugins (Omaha, 
>>> Monitoring, something new, ...).
>>> Everything is great so far except for the missing UI hooks Shim mentions.
>>>
>>> What I want to do are mostly easy thing, like adding a new tab to the 
>>> host form or host show page. Currently, the only way to do this is using 
>>> deface.
>>> But this feels pretty hacky to me and isn't good to maintain. I'd really 
>>> appreciate if there were easy and tested hooks for common areas like the 
>>> host show page.
>>>
>>> In my opinion, we are already too late on finishing the facets (and 
>>> Pagelets) integration. Personally, I don't have a strong opinion on either 
>>> option. But prefer the second approach as well.
>>>
>>> In regards to widening the feature gap for a host ux redesign: We have 
>>> to provide extension points anyways. The Foreman community gains a lot of 
>>> value from the rich plugin ecosystem and the possibility to extend Foreman 
>>> fairly easy.
>>> When we redo the host ux pages, we have to provide extension points. 
>>> This is not a nice-to-have feature, but a must-have in my opinion.
>>>
>>> - Timo
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "foreman-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to