Hello sorry for bumping this old thread but the issue still exists since http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/7605 is still not implemented. So my question is: what's the "best practice" for a new Katello installation to be integrated as best as possible with an *existing* Foreman installation where I've already poured hours of configurations & tinkering?
Because right now I've installed (following the Katello manual) a fresh katello install on a brand new virtual machine and now I have a full foreman install with no data and knowing nothing about my already in place Foreman installation. Thanks! On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 10:03:38 AM UTC+1, Cédric Dupont wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the issue link. > Here we have the same question. Using foreman since 2 years and happy. We > have get a look before at candlepin/pulp/katello but never make the step to > use them. > Now that Katello is a plugin, we will be very happy to deploy them. > So I understand it's needing time. > > To wait, can you give some advice/best practice if people want to start > using the candlepin and pulp product for exemple, so that later, we can > integrate all these beautiful products together when installing Katello ? > For exemple : > can we start by installing candlepin/pulp and later these ones will just > need the installation of a capsule ? > is there some good advice about what to avoid in configuration of Foreman > for later integration of katello plugin ? (thinking hostgroup, puppet > environnements ...) > > Thanks, > > Cédric > > 2015-02-08 21:28 GMT+01:00 Eric D Helms <ericd...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > : > >> Howdy, >> >> You cannot currently add Katello to an existing Foreman. Katello requires >> a stand-alone installation that provides itself and Foreman. This has been >> a popular request and as such is being tracked here - >> http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/7605 >> >> Thanks, >> Eric >> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Cristian Falcas <cristi...@gmail.com >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Can Katelllo 2.1 be installed inside an existing foreman installation? >>> I can't find anything to say that this is true. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Cristian Falcas >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Foreman users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to foreman-user...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >>> To post to this group, send email to forema...@googlegroups.com >>> <javascript:>. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Foreman users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to foreman-user...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to forema...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Foreman users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
