After playing around with composite content views today, I wonder if others
may agree with the need for an RFE:

I have a CV "RHEL Atomic Host" and another cv "Solr" that I've combined
into CCV "Solr Appliance". I've chosen to use latest of both CVs in the
CCV. Now here's the problem: I want to use the latest CV versions from a
specific lifecycle environment, namely Production.

The problem is that if I publish a new version of CV Solr, I'd want to wait
to consume it in my CCV until it reaches the Production lifecycle
environment.

The RFE would be "As a user, I want to choose the lifecycle environment to
use when determining the version for a component CV in a CCV."

The current tooling forces the lifecycle environment to always be Library.
This would, or course, still be an option and the default.

Thoughts?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to