Hey I did not see any 422 error before this transaction so I think this is it. > Although I did not see any long MySQL queries, the whole transaction still > took ~11 seconds to complete for some reason: >
Name has already been taken - this usually means that host (either discovered or managed or unmanaged) of that name "macXXXXXXXXX" already exist. Same mac address? You can change easily how discovered hosts are being named, by default it is "mac" + MAC address, you can change that to random number or any different fact you want. See settings and our documentation. Try to add a random number at the end if that helps. > > >> For smart proxy, there was a patch done by Dmitri who redesigned DHCP >> parser, it's much more capable and faster now. I think this landed in >> 1.16 RC1, yeah: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/19441 >> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fprojects.theforeman.org%2Fissues%2F19441&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGvX5FtIFwzkZEj8ilJdCjDl8c4oQ> >> (https://github.com/theforeman/smart-proxy/commit/21813c6cde >> 0d2be10747682f1a001a7c0bd3ffb9) >> > > From my side, any performance improvements for DHCP SmP is always a > welcomed change :) > > >> I did not hear about unresponsive smart-proxy processes, can you check >> system limits (open handles etc)? SELinux? Firewall. Any proxy plugins >> enable? Then file a redmine bug, haven't seen that. >> > > That's the problem - no smoking gun that I could find. No system resource > shortages logged, system itself is a rather beefy VM that does not even > sweat, no firewalls, selinux set to permissive mode. I only run 3 SmP - > bmc, dhcp and tftp. > On top of that, since I can't replicate this at will, I have to wait until > this issue manifests itself naturally. > > And just to make it clear - it is not that SmP process becomes completely > unresponsive, but only an API-facing part. That's why I'm wondering if > moving away from Webrick to Apache or Nginx with Passenger is a possibility. > Proxy is a regular Sinatra app, so any Rack servere should do the trick (Puma perhaps). I'd try that to see if it helps. Might be bug in Webrick, try to downgrade or upgrade it. Another question along the same lines - is it possible to run each of the > smart-proxies as a separate processes (listening on different ports) > instead of one with several proxies and single port. For example, in this > particular situation even if one SmP was having an issue, it would not > affect the other 2, also it would also pinpoint the troubled proxy > simplifying troubleshooting efforts. > We don't support that, unfortunately. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Foreman users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
