* Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <[email protected]> [20091214 18:46]: > I've just finished a first usable libphash (#519290) package for Debian. > Before pushing it to NEW I would appreciate a review from the team. I'm not > experienced in libraries packaging so a review could avoid issues with > ftp-master.
> Homepage: http://phash.org > Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=forensics/libphash.git > Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/forensics/libphash.git The libs look ok to me. But libphash-samples maybe isn't perfect yet: * Binary names like test_video are calling for problems. Are the binaries useful at all or would providing just the cpp files be sufficient? * Assuming the binaries should be shipped: there are no manpages for all the provided binaries. * I'd prefer something like phash-samples as package name for a package providing binaries instead of lib*. * I assume the DH_VERBOSE=1 inside debian/rules is intentional for now. ;) Though I'd appreciate if you could use the branching approach we use in the forensics project. It was established by Daniel in recent days and the big benefit of it is that the upstream tarball is available within the git repository. The documentation used to be available at: http://daniel.debian.net/documents/cheatpages/git.html http://daniel.debian.net/documents/cheatpages/maintainer.html Though Daniel's website seems to be offline, I just uploaded a copy therefore to: http://people.debian.org/~mika/forensics/git.html http://people.debian.org/~mika/forensics/maintainer.html [Yeah, we should provide official docs for our workflow on the Debian forensics homepage once....] Thanks for your work. just my 2 cent && regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ forensics-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
