thread started here  -
http://lists.foresightlinux.org/pipermail/foresight-devel/2012-September/002616.html

All the best,

António Meireles
--
Lead Developer, The Foresight Linux Project
http://www.foresightlinux.org


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Lance Haig <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would agree that a fresh start would be a good thing to go with.
>
> Can I be a pain and ask that you resend your September e-mail again please
> so it is part of this discussion :-)
>
> Thanks
>
> Lance
>
> On 05/02/2013 14:01, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
>
>> The foresight.rpath.org repository is getting unwieldy.  The content
>> store (of only unique files, compressed) is approaching 800GB. The
>> database takes up over 100GB on disk.  That alone would make it not
>> particularly feasible to mirror from scratch, but it gets worse: the
>> Foresight repository was one of the earliest Conary repositories, and
>> so suffered from some early Conary bugs, and was even used for some
>> Conary experiments, so it's actually impossible to mirror because
>> Conary will give up.  So the only way I can set up a mirror is to
>> dump the database, copy the contents, restore the database onto the
>> new location, and then mirror from there.
>>
>> Putting FL3 into that repository seems like a really bad idea.
>>
>> I would like to propose that for FL3, we use a separate repository
>> in the foresightlinux.org domain space.  We'll use a label structure
>> like I proposed back in September.
>>
>> I'd further propose that every time we change the major version of
>> Foresight (not very often!) we create a new repository.  Therefore,
>> the repository name should probably include the version.  So,
>> something like f3.foresightlinux.org.  Given that, putting the
>> version number in the labels seems redundant.  However, the version
>> in the labels serves a different purpose: to indicate intended
>> compatibility between repositories.  That means that a label of
>> f3.foresightlinux.org@fl:3-**devel would not contain as much
>> redundancy as it looks like.
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Foresight-devel mailing list
>> Foresight-devel@lists.**foresightlinux.org<[email protected]>
>> https://lists.foresightlinux.**org/mailman/listinfo/**foresight-devel<https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Foresight-devel mailing list
> Foresight-devel@lists.**foresightlinux.org<[email protected]>
> https://lists.foresightlinux.**org/mailman/listinfo/**foresight-devel<https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Foresight-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel

Reply via email to