-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 14:32:47 +0000 António Meireles <[email protected]> wrote:
> [1] i 've picked xml here, because, well, because the format looked a > bit easier, visually on the eyes, than going to json, which would be > another valid choice. whatever we pick as the storage format, after > processing i suppose things will be pure json structures anyway, as > that gives us a cheap/simple and well established way to map things > to python objects. Not to start a discussion on the implementation (unless of course, this is the right time, I'd vote for something more YAML-like. It is imho much clear and easy to follow, edit, etc. This looks exciting! - -- Og B. Maciel - GPG/PGP: D5CFC202 http://ogmaciel.tumblr.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlETvmoACgkQUDEm1NXPwgKacACgj8R611ZthZGpgdE3FH9AP1PB l0wAoIp4GxlRDAbhF0i6RI1WhAKjmfVu =hZeB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
