On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 01:16:52PM +0200, Tomas Forsman wrote: > But in the past, we only have fl:1-devel and fl:1 only. That made it > probably easier to promote stuff and doing it more frequently. > Cant it be a good start to skip -qa repo again and go back to only have > 2 repo to concentrate on? Thats atleast a start of something.... > > I think we got more users today that uses fl:2-devel repo than we had > in the past. That can spot the ugly issues, that may cause serious > problems.
Good point. I think that is merely a symptom of the lack of core distro experience and time to fix the issues that prevent promoting -- when fl:2 was more closely related to rpl:2-qa, it was promoted often -- sometimes more than once a day, certainly several times a week. In my proposed world, -qa would actually become *more* important; -devel would be where individual foresight packages would be built, and -qa would really be where the integration with the base OS would happen. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
