On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Martin Bähr<mba...@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> I am against the proposal to adopt Boots organizationally as a >> Foresight sub-project > > could you explain this one please? > the reason is much more interesting than the vote.
Basically I don't think that Boots *needs* to be a Foresight sub-project in order to be useful to us. Regardless of how it ends up being categorized, one can conary update foo=boots.rpath....@fl:2. -- Og B. Maciel omac...@foresightlinux.org ogmac...@gnome.org ogmac...@ubuntu.com GPG Keys: D5CFC202 http://www.ogmaciel.com (en_US) http://blog.ogmaciel.com (pt_BR) _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
