On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Bertrand Juglas <b...@juglas.name> wrote:
> I've not waited enough, pkcon update seems to have blocked after a > finished update, there was nothing more in the callback line printed > have the lastline printed ??? on the callback its important the end because on the callback send the signals of packages whats installed... if tnever end ... then packagekit never know conary endprocess of updateall. > in the conary backend all so i had to kill the conary backend to retry > and pkmon showed the end of the update system. > Now I'm retrying with: > sudo pkcon update -y -p -v > It doesn't use progress bar but only Percentage lines. > It seems to have continued where it was blocked so it has managed to > finish, it's pretty annoying me : > im cannot check until now. :( the issue of repquery( http://zodman.aa.am/blog/entrada/2010/mar/9/conary-packagekit-its-taped-foresight-release) its consumming me.... i have a night trying to find the reason .. of why doing a repos.findtrove() taking alot of time end. > 2010/3/7 Bertrand Juglas <b...@juglas.name>: > > Hello, > > I've checked both, gnome-packagekit stills block after listing > > updates, i suppose it's because it doesn't manage to get updates > > details. > > The pkcon command line doesn't block but does not always updates the > > progress bar, mostly for pkcon update, so if you have a very slow wifi > > and don't watch the conary backend log, you don't see the progress, > > which makes you think it's blocked but it isn"t. > > Using a not updated packagekit command line instead of an updated > > conary command line doesn't seems really usefull. The main usage of > > PackageKit in Foresight is its gnome interface so we should unblock it > > as soon as possible, maybe by disabling blocking features if they are > > not essential. > > Hope it will help you Andres, > > have a good week ! > > > > 2010/2/26 Andres Vargas <zod...@foresightlinux.org>: > >> check both! > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Bertrand Juglas <b...@juglas.name> wrote: > >> > >>> I will test it during my french afternoon or evening so we can talk > about > >>> it > >>> ;) > >>> But you haven't precised if we shoult test the GUI of PackageKit or the > >>> commandline or both, what should work after applying your updates? > >>> See you later ! > >>> > >>> Le 26 févr. 2010 07:07, "Andres Vargas" <zod...@foresightlinux.org> a > >>> écrit : > >>> > >>> im push a a new branch on PackageKit git repo named conary-devel it > have > >>> small changes, what can solve the packagekit. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Im commit the small patch to fl:2-devel with PackageKit 0.5.6 ... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Im test it and seen its non blocker plz > >>> > >>> > >>> When run the packagekit ... check /tmp/conarybackend.log its a log of > >>> what conary backend its doing ... and check if something freeze/stoped > >>> for longo. When doing rquery sometimes take me a long time to > >>> solve ..... > >>> > >>> Help me to test packagekit plz .... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Foresight-devel mailing list > >>> Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org > >>> http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Foresight-devel mailing list > >>> Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org > >>> http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Foresight-devel mailing list > >> Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org > >> http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Foresight-devel mailing list > Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org > http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel > _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
