On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 02:09:05AM +0100, Martin Baehr wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:04:46PM -0500, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > > > maybe i need to update more than just the conary package. > > I assume you have conary, conary-build, and conary-repository in sync? > > no, i hadn't. somehow i'd rather have conary tell me that they need to > be in sync rather than memorizing it.
There are deps that should keep them in sync. Wonder what happened? > the new generated model looks rather good btw. (of course this is on a > machine that was already using the system-model, so it is not that big > of a surprise) Sure -- we just wanted to test the changes to genmodel on various real-life systems to make sure that we didn't miss anything while making the changes. > btw: i am confused about the following: > [r...@bearly conary]# conary q emacs --troves > emacs=23.2-1-1 > emacs:data=23.2-1-1 > [r...@bearly conary]# conary update emacs > The following updates will be performed: > Install emacs:doc=23.2-1-1 > Install emacs:elisp=23.2-1-1 > Install emacs:runtime=23.2-1-1 > continue with update? [Y/n] > > i thought conary update would not install anything extra. I'm confused, too. Try that update with --model-trace=emacs:runtime and see if it helps clarify any. We're not entirely satisfied that update semantics are perfect; see CNY-3555 for an example where the semantics are showing up in a way that seemed surprising. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
