On 01/17/2011 03:48 PM, Martin Bähr wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:13:50PM +0800, Jesse Zhang wrote: >> Now that 2.5 alpha1 has been out, we could plan for a second prerelease. >> (Or would it be better as the final release?) >> >> Some time should be left to listen for feedback and fix issues. One >> week? Two weeks? > > what steps are needed to move to stable?
> i guess new images can just simply run from stable, so only upgrading > older versions are the sensitive part. Yeah, makes sense. But maybe with the 'QA' label, we are being explicit that this is alpha release, and breakage is not unexpected. After one or two prereleases, we will know that the system has good enough quality and then we can focus on the upgrading path. > has anyone else tested ermos upgrade script yet? I have tested it once. I believe it's of 'product quality'. Anyway it's not a big app, and ermo has put enough efforts for various details. Only remaining is to put it in the group update script. But I have no idea how that can be tested without a push to fl:2. jesse _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
