Hi Darius, you are right that the new operations will not be generated.....but at least the user will get a compile error, so he knows that the new operations should be implemented, otherwise he could forgett it....by the way it would be great if the outlet would add the new operations and comment out the ones removed:) This would be the best solution in long term:)
If we have the default implementation of the operation in the abstract class the generation process would be smoother, but the use more error-prone. With the other solution the generation step could have compile errors if new ops are inserted but after everything is corrected we can be sure that the user has taken a look at each operation which should be implemented.... How about to make this 2 options configurable? One could choose via a property between the 2 behaviours....so everybody would be happy and it doesnt even need to much work than implementing just one solution:) Bye, Istvan >From: Darius Jockel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Fornax-developer] [Cartridges: JavaBasic] Should methods >defindedin an Inte >Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 04:13:52 -0700 (PDT) > > > > >dhol68 wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > having the default impl in the abstract class will be in my opinion > > confusing for the user, because he will not see what operations should >be > > implemented only if he looks at the abstract class > > > > >I'm not shure about that. If this behavior is well documented, I see no >problem. > > > > > ......by default he should > > only open/work with the base class in my understanding. > > > >thats absolutly true ! :-) > > > > > And what happens if > > somebody extends the generated abstract class manually and all the >methods > > have def impl already? > > > Overwrite the methods. >Ok, in this case you must do this manually, and cant make it your ide ;-) > >Another little note: If you write the default implementation into the >manual-base class, >new operations may not be generated, because the generator don't overwrite >the existing class (because of the manuall outlet). > >Regards >Darius > >-- >View this message in context: >http://www.nabble.com/-Cartridges%3A-JavaBasic--Should-methods-definded-in-an-Interface-be-abstract-in-the-AbstractClass--tf3768454s17564.html#a10680216 >Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >_______________________________________________ >Fornax-developer mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Fornax-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
