Hi again,
I now tried to play around with n:m mappings but had no luck unfortunately.
This posting
(http://www.nabble.com/Many-To-Many-Relations-with-Hibernate-cartridge-td10250172s17564.html#a10371308)
suggests actually that exaclty what I expect can be generated but I dont get
it generated at all.
I modelled a simple n:m relation between two classes USER and PROJECT. The
relation is bidirectional and has multiplicity * on both ends. I get these
mappings concerning relations:
<set access="property" inverse="true" name="user">
<key>
<column name="PROJECT_TO_USER_ITEM_ID" not-null="false" />
</key>
<many-to-many class="de.User">
<column name="PROJECT_TO_USER" not-null="false" />
</many-to-many>
</set>
<set access="property" inverse="true" name="project">
<key>
<column name="PROJECT_TO_USER_ITEM_ID" not-null="false" />
</key>
<many-to-many class="de.Project">
<column name="PROJECT_TO_USER" not-null="false" />
</many-to-many>
</set>
What is missing is the mapping for the relation table, something like
<set access="property" inverse="true" name="project" table="xxx">
...
Am I missing something?
==================================
Then I also found another potential bug or maybe just a potential
enhancement request:
If I create two 1:n relations between these classes, then I end up with
naming collisions
for relation columns. I think it is not covered by the cartridge yet --
right?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-N%3AM-Mappings-in-HB-Cartridge-tp14649327s17564p14649327.html
Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fornax-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
