I think this would solve the problem. In our case many-to-many relations are explicit in the model so I do not need the dot notation for my project.
Patrik Nordwall wrote: > > I have done some thinking, and I don't see any big problems ... > > The basic idea is to add the following to the metamodel (and also in DSL): > - dbtable in DomainObject > - dbcolumn in Attribute > - dbcolumn in Reference > > For simple unidirectional associations with multiplicity 1 it is no > problem. > > For bidirectional one-to-many associations it should only be possible to > define dbcolumn on the reference pointing to the one-side. > ... > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Sculptor--column-names-for-existing-database--tp15177242s17564p15298700.html Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fornax-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
