ah, I see what you're saying. Yes, that is true. I have not added new fields to every class. Maybe it's not so bad then.
Thanks, Polly Patrik Nordwall wrote: > > > > amphoras wrote: >> >> Hmm, I am thinking though--if I must copy the entire create extension and >> then add my few setters, then why bother? This is not very modular. I >> might as well just edit the original DslTransformation.ext file. I was >> hoping to just "extend" the original definition with my extra calls >> without actually duplicating the original. But unless I'm missing >> something, maybe that's just not possible. >> > > Yes, I know it is a workaround, but it is still better than maintaining a > copy of the whole DslTransformation file. I assume you haven't added new > things to all classes. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Sculptor--Using-AOP-on-DslTransformation.ext-tp18968553s17564p18971118.html Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fornax-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
