I am not using these classes for persistence (I just need to be able to model and generate the domain objects correctly), but we could name the tables in the format "<module>_<domainObject>.
Thanks, Polly Patrik Nordwall wrote: > > It is currently not possible to do this. I'm not sure how complicated it > would be to implement this, but my feeling is that it is a limitation that > most people can live with. > > How would we name things in the database? > > /Patrik > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Sculptor--resolving-references-to-domain-objects-with-same-name-in-different-modules-tp19152982s17564p19164842.html Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fornax-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
