Le 29/11/2021 à 16:03, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches a écrit :
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c
index f5ba7cecd54..16ee2afc9c0 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c
@@ -5229,7 +5229,6 @@ gfc_expr_walker (gfc_expr **e, walk_expr_fn_t exprfn,
void *data)
case EXPR_OP:
WALK_SUBEXPR ((*e)->value.op.op1);
WALK_SUBEXPR_TAIL ((*e)->value.op.op2);
- break;
case EXPR_FUNCTION:
for (a = (*e)->value.function.actual; a; a = a->next)
WALK_SUBEXPR (a->expr);
I’m uncomfortable with the above change.
It makes it look like there is a fall through, but there is not.
Maybe inline the macro to make the continue explicit, or use
WALK_SUBEXPR instead of WALK_SUBEXPR_TAIL and hope the compiler will do
the tail call optimization.
Mikael
