On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I am awaiting a green light to commit this patch.... or not.

I'd say go ahead.

Richard.

> Cheers
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 16:49, Paul Richard Thomas <
> paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Before answering that, I thought that I had better try the polyhedron
> > suite with -fwrapv and -std=legacy together. As far as I can see, all is
> > well and so, yes, I think that is a good idea.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > ================================================================================
> > Date & Time     :  9 Mar 2023 18:13:04
> > Test Name       : gfor_13
> > Compile Command : gfc13 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 -fwrapv -std=legacy
> > %n.f90 -o %n
> > Benchmarks      : ac aermod air capacita channel2 doduc gas_dyn2 fatigue2
> > induct2 linpk mp_prop_design nf protein rnflow test_fpu2 tfft2
> > Maximum Times   :    10000.0
> > Target Error %  :      0.100
> > Minimum Repeats :     1
> > Maximum Repeats :     2
> >
> >    Benchmark   Compile  Executable   Ave Run  Number   Estim
> >         Name    (secs)     (bytes)    (secs) Repeats   Err %
> >    ---------   -------  ----------   ------- -------  ------
> >           ac      0.00       55904      7.17       2  0.0628
> >       aermod      0.00     1280104     10.77       2  1.2769
> >          air      0.00      136392      4.09       2  0.4276
> >     capacita      0.00      102680     23.79       2  0.7587
> >     channel2      0.00       43928    108.59       2  0.5834
> >        doduc      0.00      194224     13.98       2  0.2468
> >     gas_dyn2      0.00      104080    105.46       2  0.1659
> >     fatigue2      0.00       90752     62.86       2  1.3092
> >      induct2      0.00      224920     58.08       2  0.6594
> >        linpk      0.00       51768      7.15       2  0.4892
> > mp_prop_desi      0.00       48432     94.28       2  0.0164
> >           nf      0.00       64480     11.16       2  0.0134
> >      protein      0.00      140592     24.22       2 10.0347
> >       rnflow      0.00      197704     20.74       2  0.1904
> >    test_fpu2      0.00      147232     53.54       2  0.1093
> >        tfft2      0.00       43896     55.09       2  3.8688
> >
> > Geometric Mean Execution Time =      26.19 seconds
> >
> >
> > ================================================================================
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 17:30, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >>
> >> > -fdefault-integer-8 does indeed fix the problem with
> >> > rnflow.f90 but breaks tfft2.f90, with a type mismatch at lines 36 and
> >> 44.
> >> >
> >> >        integer(8), parameter   :: jmul =  843314861  ! multiplicateur
> >> >        integer(8), parameter   :: jadd =  453816693  ! constante
> >> additive
> >> > Does the job and is portable.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I think -frwapv (as suggested by Jakub) would be the better choice.
> >> The problem is the linear congruential pseudo-random number generators
> >> which were much used in earlier times (and are still present in
> >> legacy code), which violate the Fortran standards by assuming silent
> >> truncation.
> >>
> >> If a new optimization breaks this (widespread, but illegal) idiom,
> >> maybe the best way to deal with it is to add -frwapv to -std=legacy.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >>         Thomas
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
> > Albert Einstein
> >
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman;
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to