Le 10/05/2024 à 21:56, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Am 10.05.24 um 21:48 schrieb Harald Anlauf:
Hi Mikael,
Am 10.05.24 um 11:45 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Le 09/05/2024 à 22:30, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
I'll stop here...
Thanks. Go figure, I have no problem reproducing today.
It's PR99798 (and there is even a patch for it).
this patch has rotten a bit: the type of gfc_reluease_symbol
has changed to bool, this can be fixed.
Unfortunately, applying the patch does not remove the ICEs here...
Oops, I take that back! There was an error on my side applying the
patch; and now it does fix the ICEs after correcting that hickup....
Now the PR99798 patch is ready to be pushed, but I won't be available
for a few days. We can finish our discussion on this topic afterwards.
We currently do not recover well from errors, and the prevention
of corrupted namespaces is apparently a goal we aim at.
Yes, and we are not there yet. But at least there is a sensible error
message before the crash.
True. But having a sensible error before ICEing does not improve
user experience either.
Are you planning to work again on PR99798?
Cheers,
Harald
Cheers,
Harald
The patch therefore does not require any testsuite update and
should not give any other surprises, so it should be very safe.
The plan is also to leave the PR open for the time being.
Regtesting on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
