Hi All,
I have just noticed that line 9 in the testcase is not what was intended.
It should read:
integer, len, PUBLIC :: idim ! { dg-error "is not allowed" }
and that the second dg-error should be removed.
Paul
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 10:58, Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a trivial patch that enforces the requirement that PDT parameters
> do not have an access specification and appear before a PRIVATE statement
> within the derived type.
>
> Regtests on FC42/x86_64. OK for mainline?
>
> Paul
>
>
