Hi Jerry, For some reason (fingers!) pdt_41.f03 had disappeared from my tree. Now that I have pulled afresh, there it is. Consider that the numbers of the tests in today's submissions are bumped by one.
Thanks for spotting that and for the reviews. I'll push first thing tomorrow. Regards Paul On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 18:13, Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/2/25 4:43 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > The attached ChangeLogs explain the chunk in expr.cc. The chunk > > in is_extension_of was something of a surprise to me since I thought > that we had > > stopped using the hash to identify derived types and to restrict their > use to > > intrinsic types a long time ago. Using the vptr location is unambiguous. > > > > Regtests (yes, really :-) ) on FC42, x86_64. OK for mainline? > > > > Paul > > > > > > This is OK, the patch trys to add pdt_41.f90 which existed here already. > ??? > > Tested here OK. > > Thanks, > > Jerry >
