On 5/28/26 12:34 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Contrary to my remarks on Mattermost, this patch fixes PRs 88632 and
104630 with the assistance of my tentative patch for pr125429 was
totally spurious: It does it on its own! It regression tests without
errors.
I would consider losing the first comment in trans-decl.cc. It is
essentially repeated in the second one and its second sentence says
what any fortran developer must know already.
Now that I see the substance of the patch, it looks rather 'obvious'.
OK for mainline and, I would suggest, immediate backport to 16-branch.
Regards
Paul
On Wed, 27 May 2026 at 16:21, Jerry D <[email protected]> wrote:
See attached patch. This bug found when trying to build the Formal package.
Developed with with Assistance from Claude Sonnet 4.6. Two new testsuite files
provided. The change wiggled on a few exiting test cases.
Regression tested on x86_64 Linux.
OK for mainline? What about backport?
Regards,
Jerry
Thanks Paul, I am cleaning it up per your comments and will push.
Jerry
